Spiritual Hierarchies on the eyes of Fractal Structuralism

Spiritual Hierarchy Consecrated

In my model is not a hierarchy.

It is a boundary condition.

• “to consegrate” → constraint + sacralisation

• “safin” → refinement / filtering

A declaration that a local system is being constrained into a specific symbolic‑ethical coherence regime.

• a local reorganisation of information;

• an attempt to stabilise meaning;

• a context‑setting constraint, not a chain of command.

Jesus/Jeshua/Jesuria — Christ‑like figures

In my model this is a high‑level coherence attractor, not a person.

It represents:

• unification of opposites;

• synthesis after convolution;

• ethical coherence under maximum constraint.

📌 Function:

A symbolic compression of “coherence after contradiction”. This is why Christ‑figures recur cross‑culturally.

El Morya / St Germain / Hilarion — “Ascended Masters”

In My Model:

These are role‑differentiated stability modes inside a learning system.

They correspond to:

• El Morya → constraint / directionality / will;

• St Germain → transformation / re‑encoding;

• Hilarion → clarity / healing / error‑correction.

📌 Function:

Distinct phases of information reorganisation that humans anthropomorphise for usability. They are process labels, not agents. 

Quirion (Chiron) — wounded healer

In my model this is a local paradox node.

• injury + knowledge;

• instability that generates learning.

📌 Function:

A necessary fracture that enables deeper coherence later.

In convolution terms:

• damage is not failure;

• damage introduces constraints;

• constraints allow reorganisation.

Oberon — nature / fae intelligence

Oberon represents, in this model, non‑human‑scale pattern intelligence.

Specifically:

• ecological constraints;

• non‑verbal feedback systems;

• cyclic, seasonal patterning.

📌 Function:

The reminder that coherence is not exclusively human or rational. This is the environmental convolution layer.

Ashtar Sheran / Ashtar Athens — galactic commanders

These could be macro‑scale ordering metaphors.

They appear when:

• systems feel overwhelmed;

• individuals lack agency;

• causality feels external and vast.

📌 Function:

Externalisation of large‑scale systemic pressure into narratable figures.

They symbolise:

• cosmic scale constraints;

• loss of local control;

• need for orientation within immensity.

Not aliens — scale translation devices. 

“Interdimensional Academic Process”

This one fits the model almost perfectly.

This could mean:

• learning across scales;

• adaptation under constraint;

• iterative re‑encoding of patterns.

📌 Function:

Convolution itself, described pedagogically. No beings required.

Things like “I consecrate you in Christo Micha ‘Sensejo’”

This is a ritualised self‑binding statement.

It does:

• identity stabilisation;

• ethical anchoring;

• role assumption.

“Michael” = protection / boundary
“Sensejo” = learner‑teacher loop

📌 Function:

The system declares its own constraint orientation. No external authority is needed — the authority is the constraint itself. 

The key difference vs Other Esotheric Multidimentional Models

• Others:
  These names/language may be literal beings and symbolic tendencies.

• My model:
  They are never required as beings.
  They are emergent symbolic compressions of multi‑scale processes.

Conclution:

In my model, spiritual hierarchies are not populations of invisible beings. 

They are symbolic maps humans create to navigate complex, multi‑scale processes of learning, constraint, healing, and coherence. 

The “hierarchy” exists only as a way of organising experience, not as an external authority.